Method document
Sample size to estimate an intraclass correlation
How many participants are needed to estimate test–retest or inter-rater reliability, as an intraclass correlation (ICC) from k ratings of each participant, within a chosen margin. Covers non-response.
https://statwisely.com/methods/precision-icc/
When to use it
- A reliability study reporting the ICC of a score measured twice, or by several raters, with a confidence interval.
Not for
- Showing that the ICC exceeds a benchmark such as 0.75. Use the test of the ICC under “Detect an effect”, Measurement.
Notation
- Number of participants
- Ratings of each participant (raters or occasions)
- Expected intraclass correlation
- Full width of the interval, 2E
- Margin of error
- Standard normal quantile for confidence 1 − α (1.960 for 95%)
- Non-response rate
Formulas
Participants for an interval of width w
The large-sample variance of the one-way ICC is 2(1 − ρ)²[1 + (k − 1)ρ]²/[k(k − 1)(n − 1)]; setting the interval’s width to w gives Bonett’s formula [1]. Agreement is best near ρ = 1 and with more ratings per participant.
Non-response
The number to approach so that n respond. Applied last, after any clustering.
Parameters
Confidence level
Values: 90%, 95% or 99%
95% is the convention in health research. A higher level widens the interval, so the same margin needs a larger sample.
Margin of error
Values: Above 0 and below 1
Half the interval’s width on the coefficient’s scale: 0.1 gives an interval from 0.6 to 0.8 around an ICC of 0.7.
Expected ICC
Values: Between 0 and 1
From a pilot or an earlier reliability study; the margin should be planned at a plausible value, not the hoped-for one.
Ratings per participant
Values: At least 2
2 for a test–retest design; the number of raters when each rates every participant.
Expected non-response rateOptional
Values: 0% up to, but not including, 100%
The share of people approached who will not take part; use the response rate of a comparable study. Approaching more people restores the number of respondents, not their representativeness: if non-responders differ, the estimate can still be biased.
Assumptions
- A one-way random-effects model: participants’ true scores and the rating errors are normal and independent, with the same error variance for every rating.
- Non-response is unrelated to the outcome.
Worked examples
Test–retest reliability
ICC 0.7 within ±0.1 from 2 ratings: n = 8 × 1.96² × 0.3² × 1.7² / (2 × 0.2²) + 1 = 100.9, rounded up to 101.
Sample size: 101
Open this example in the calculatorThree raters
With 3 ratings per participant: n = 68.
Sample size: 68
Open this example in the calculatorA highly reliable instrument
ICC 0.9 within ±0.05: n = 57; a reliable instrument is estimated precisely by few participants.
Sample size: 57
Open this example in the calculatorValidation
- Every worked example on this page is recomputed by the StatWisely engine whenever the software is built. If a number or formula here stopped matching the calculator, the release would be stopped until this document was corrected.
- F-based intervals for the one-way ICC from simulated studies at the planned size had a mean half-width of 0.102 against a target of 0.10. An independent implementation in R recomputes these sizes and is compared with the engine’s.
How to cite
StatWisely. Sample size to estimate an intraclass correlation. Method document, engine version 1.0.0, reviewed 2026-10-09. https://statwisely.com/methods/precision-icc/
Cite the original references for the formulas your design uses as well.
References
- 1.Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Statistics in Medicine. 2002;21(9):1331–1335. doi:10.1002/sim.1108